Timescale for Home Education Bill 2017

A new  Home Education Bill had its First Reading in the House of Lords on June 27th 2017. I explained in the last blog post what this means and I now want to look in more detail at the TIMESCALE for this Bill moving forwards.

SUMMARY

So far nobody is likely to know what the Bill says unless someone has drawn their attention to it, and arguably there is no reason for them to be alerted at this stage since it will not be discussed in the House of Lords until October/November and then only for a couple of hours maximum (2nd Reading). Depending on the timing of this, the next stage could be either side of Christmas, where the peer who put forward the Bill will deal with suggestions (amendments) put forward by other members of the House of Lords (Committee). Again this will only be an hour or two single session.

Previous Bills in a comparable situation

  1. stop at 2nd Reading;
  2. stop at Committee; or
  3. stop at the end of the House of Lords because there is no parliamentary time to squeeze them into the Commons.

You can sign up for email updates to the Home Education Bill which is how you get notice of timings or new paperwork. 1 PAGE HANDOUT TO PRINT

email

BALLOT SYSTEM 

From 2015 the House of Lords has had a ballot system for Private Member’s Bills which determines how soon the Bill can get its 2nd Reading and therefore how quickly it can finish all the necessary stages in the House of Lords before theoretically arriving at the House of Commons.

Lord Soley’s Bill is number 9 on the ballot. (Last year only the top 20 made it to Second Reading as I demonstrated in my previous blog post )

PARLIAMENTARY YEAR

The ballot number is highly relevant because this type of Bill runs out at the end of the parliamentary year (“session”) and is not carried over to the next parliamentary year (unlike Government Bills which only run out of time at the end of the parliamentary term when there is an election) which is one of the many many reasons why Private Members Bills introduced in the Lords so rarely make it into law.

FRIDAYS

By convention these Private Members Bills are only debated (often back to back)  on particular Fridays. The main business of the week tends to finish on the Thursday so normally you would expect fewer peers to come in on a Friday.

ALL BILL INFORMATION 

Private Members Bills appear in the list of “Bills Before Parliament”  Click on the Bill to reach the Bill page, which will look like this

2ndread

From this you can see:

  • the Bill started in the House of Lords
  • it is sponsored by someone called Lord Soley
  • it has had its First Reading
  • there is no date set at present for Second Reading (but you will get this if you sign up for email updates  as above or keep checking the page)

It might not be immediately apparent but the  page contains a lot of information.  The “Read debates on all stages” page   becomes increasingly relevant because you can see whether the Bill is actually being discussed or whether the stage is just a formality.

The bill documents link also becomes more useful as the Bill progresses because this is where you can spot whether any amendments have been tabled for Committee stage.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/bills-and-legislation/ is another good reference page.

bills This is where you can find the link to the Passage of a Bill as well as Bills before Parliament and  Bills from previous years.

PASSAGE OF A BILL 

Since the Home Education Bill has had its First Reading, we need to look at Second Reading for a Bill starting in the Lords  and from there to Committee   which is where AMENDMENTS come into play.

PRIVATE MEMBERS BILL COMMITTEE

It is important to note that there is NOT a dedicated committee set up for the purpose of scrutinising this type of Bill; instead any peer who wishes to take part in the debate on the allotted Friday may do so and may also table amendments. In addition,  peers are NOT summoned to vote so there might only be a dozen people taking part.

The Committee page also mentions that this stage lasts for up to 8 days but this is for GOVERNMENT BILLS.    For previous Private Members Bills starting in the Lords I have been back through the debates and found that Committee stage is over in a single session lasting an hour or two, see this spreadsheet for more details.

committeelords

 

PARLIAMENT TV

Once you have the date of various debates, you can also watch on the Parliament TV archive and see the number of peers who were actually there, which is not something you would necessarily pick up from a transcript.

The Parliament TV home page starts with the Commons so for this type of Bill you have to click on the tab for the House of Lords  To see previous debates go to “View Archive”  which is located in the bottom right hand corner.

lordstv

The archive will again default to the Commons so you have to switch it to Lords on the dropdown list.

search

 

 

2016 PRIVATE MEMBERS LORDS BALLOT NUMBERS 5 – 10 

The Home Education Bill was drawn at number 9  in the 2017 Private Members Lords ballot, so I looked at the previous year’s ballot, with particular reference to numbers 5-10. For an annotated spreadsheet of the 2016 ballot, click here

2016 ballot numbers  6, 8 and 10 did not go any further than 2nd Reading in the Lords while ballot number 7 reached Committee stage in the Lords and ballot number 9   made it through Committee and as far as Third Reading in the Lords which in theory allowed it to move on to the Commons although this never happened.

 

2016 BALLOT POSITION NUMBER 7

Ballot position number 7 in 2016 was the House of Lords Act 1999 (Amendment) Bill.  1st Reading was in May and 2nd Reading was in September. 2nd Reading debate lasted 2 hours.   For this particular Bill, amendments for Committee began to be put forward soon after 2nd Reading. It would seem that Committee for this Bill was expected to be busy, in any event it was not scheduled until December. You can watch the Committee session  here  to see how the debate unfolded and how the Committee deals with amendments. This Bill did not progress beyond Committee.

SCREENSHOT COMMITTEE SESSION FOR 2016 BALLOT NUMBER 7, HOUSE OF LORDS AMENDMENT BILL

AMEND

 

2016 BALLOT POSITION NUMBER 9 

Ballot position number 9 in 2016 was the Lobbying Transparency Bill. 1st Reading in May, 2nd Reading in September, Committee in November (Committee is significant because it is when amendments tabled by other peers are debated), and finally Report and 3rd Reading in December. In theory the Bill could have proceeded to the Commons but as usual this did not happen because this type of Bill is low priority and there are many timetabling pressures.

The peer introducing the Bill to Committee said “we are very short on time today” and it rattled through in 40 minutes. You can watch the Committee session for this Bill here  to see how few peers were involved.

SCREENSHOT COMMITTEE SESSION FOR 2016 BALLOT NUMBER 9, LOBBYING TRANSPARENCY BILL 

Watch from this point [14.38] to see how quickly the Committee session is wound up. This is emphatically NOT a numbers game. With this type of Bill peers are NOT summoned to vote as with the big Government Bills of the day; there might only be a dozen people taking part.

content

 

Report stage for 2016 ballot number 9 Bill took place 3 weeks after Committee with no debate followed by 3rd Reading a week later. The record notes that “The Bill was read a third time. A privilege amendment was made and the Bill was passed and sent to the Commons” In fact though, nothing happened with the Commons because as so often there was no parliamentary time.

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Timescale for Home Education Bill 2017

  1. Ruth O'Hare

    Given how busy the current, extra long, parliamentary session is going to be with Brexit I don’t see how this is going to make it to the Commons.

    My only concern is if there’s a ‘convenient’ child abuse case in the headlines. Is Soley doing an Ed Balls and positioning his bill really to capitalise on a tragedy that we’re unaware of? If not my guess is that it is just posturing, virtue signalling to the ‘child welfare industry’ lobby.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Fiona Nicholson Post author

      I can’t see even the top 5 bills being given space in the Commons. Lord S has remembered he’s against it and just wants to raise the profile I imagine. That or Daniel Monk has jogged his elbow, again just to raise the profile of the issue, like there aren’t more pressing concerns.

      Like

      Reply
  2. grit

    I feel this bill, by repeating the same old Badmans time and again – registration, monitoring, access to the child – is part of a slow process of ‘normalising’ these demands; to bring about a state of ‘inevitability’. But there are push-backs against ‘inevitabilities’. And I hope the home ed world carries on repeating all the positive results that emerge from home ed cultures. We too have ‘inevitabilities’ on our side: the determination of parents to meet the unique needs of their own kids free of school restrictions. Thanks for keeping the news up there, Fiona.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Schools Week Article on Home Education July 2017 | edyourself

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s